Christopher Shea, writing in The Chronicle of Higher Education:
If sociologists ignore genes, will other academics — and the wider world — ignore sociology?
Some in the discipline are telling their peers just that. With study
after study finding that all sorts of personal characteristics are
heritable — along with behaviors shaped by those characteristics — a
see-no-gene perspective is obsolete.
Nor, these scholars argue, is it reasonable to concede that genes play some
role but then to loftily assert that geneticists and the media
overstate that role and to go on conducting studies as if genes did not
exist. How, exactly, do genes shape human lives, interact with
environmental forces, or get overpowered by those forces? "We do
ourselves a disservice if we don't engage in those arguments," says
Jason Schnittker, an associate professor of sociology at the University
of Pennsylvania. "If we stay on the ropes, people from a different
perspective, with a more extreme view, will be making them."
Schnittker is among the contributors to a special issue of the American Journal of Sociology,
the field's flagship publication, devoted to "Genetics and Social
Structure" — evidence that at least some sociologists are attempting to
reckon with the genetic revolution. And not just in the AJS. Other top sociology journals, too, are publishing work incorporating genetic perspectives: The American Sociological Review
in August published a much-discussed article on genes and delinquency
by Guang Guo, of the University of North Carolina. (A couple of years
ago, in an early foray on this front, Guo co-edited a special section
of another top journal, Social Forces, titled "The Linking of Sociology and Biology.")
Read the rest of the article here.